Legal Protection For Trademark Holders For Similarities In Essence Based On Law Number 20 Of 2016 In The Decision Of The Supreme Court No. 796 K/Pdt. 796 K/Pdt.Sus-Hki/2023

  • Farisa Awanis Prasaja
  • Agus Mardianto
  • Ulil Afwa

Abstract

This research discusses the Legal Protection for Trademark Rights Holders for Similarities in Principal Based on Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications in Supreme Court Decision No. 796 K/Pdt.Sus-Hki/2023 with Linda Anggraeningsih and Muhammad Shakeel as the Plaintiff and Defendant Parties and the legal consequences of the decision for the parties. The purpose of this research is to analyze whether the parties have received legal protection as trademark rights holders and also the legal consequences arising from the Supreme Court's decision. This research uses a normative juridical research approach method that relies on secondary data obtained through literature studies with qualitative normative methods. The results of research and discussion in this study can be concluded that Linda Anggraeningsih has not received legal protection for her Trademark Rights because the lawsuit she won in the Commercial Court was canceled by the Cassation Decision. Supreme Court Decision Number 796 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2023 canceled Decision Number 3/Pdt.Sus-Merek/2023/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst which results in Umamascarves Trademark is still entitled to produce and market its products because it remains validly registered in PDKI so that it gets legal protection for its trademark.

References

Dirdjosisworo, Soedjono, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2010.

Harahap, M. Yahya Tinjauan Merek Secara Umun dan Hukum Merek di Indonesia, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 1996.

Indriyanto, Agung dan Irnie Mela Yusnita, Aspek Hukum Pendaftaran Merek, Rajawali Press, Jakarta, 2017.

Jened, Rahmi, Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Penyalahgunaan Hak Ekslusif, Airlangga University Press, Surabaya, 2015.

Jened, Rahmi, Hukum Merek/Trademark Law (Dalam Era Global dan Integrasi Ekonomi), Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2015.

Purwaka, Tommy Hendra, “Perlindungan Merek” (Cetakan Pertama), Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, Jakarta, 2017.

R. Soeroso, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2011.

Riswandi, Budi Agus dan Syamsudin, Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dan Budaya Hukum, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2004.

Sudikno, Mertokusumo, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Liberty Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, 1998.

Tim Lindsey, Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Suatu Pengantar, PT Alumni, Bandung, 2006.

Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek Dan Indikasi Geografis.

Kowel, Fandi H. Pelindungan Hukum Terhadap Penerima Lisensi Merek Di Indonesia, Jurnal Lex et Societatis, Vol. V No. 3 Mei 2017.

Sujatmiko, Agung. Tinjauan Filosofis Perlindungan Hak Milik Atas Merek, Jurnal Media Hukum, Vol. 18 No. 2 Desember 2011.

Suryansyah. Legal Protection on Intellectual Property Rights in the Development of Creative Economy in Mamuju Regency, Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, Vol. 2, Issue. 1, 2019.

AdminLP2M, 25 November 2021, Hak atas Kekayaan Intelektual (HaKI): Pengertian dan Jenisnya, Hak atas Kekayaan Intelektual (HaKI) : Pengertian dan Jenisnya (uma.ac.id), 31 Oktober 2023.

Published
2024-07-18
How to Cite
Prasaja, F., Mardianto, A., & Afwa, U. (2024). Legal Protection For Trademark Holders For Similarities In Essence Based On Law Number 20 Of 2016 In The Decision Of The Supreme Court No. 796 K/Pdt. 796 K/Pdt.Sus-Hki/2023. INVENTION: Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 1(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.70358/invention.v1i1.1218
Section
Articles
Abstract viewed = 205 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded = 220 times