• Tjatur Ermitajani Judi Universitas Ngurah Rai
Keywords: government response, government responsiveness, respondent government


Studies in China and Indonesia have not explained how the actual practice of government response is based on factual observations. Based on the conceptual findings of research in China, this study elaborates on the practice of government response as a process in Indonesia. Research takes the object of research as the object of observation. Researchers review research achievements in China and intuitively observe practices in Indonesia. The results of the review and observation of government response research as a process show that almost all concepts, models and types of government responses in China are practiced by the Indonesian government. Studies in China and practice in Indonesia, following the perspective of governance, government-citizen interaction, response attitude, and the manner and content of government responses. Based on a study in China, which is very rich in concepts, the Indonesian government's response appears to be more chronological, careful, flexible, and considerate. Scholars in both countries can learn from and draw on experiences for further studies that are useful in the construction of respondent government models, as well as provide useful empirical examples for improving government response capacity.


Arianto, J. (2017). NGO atau LSM sebagai sarana membangun budaya politik Indonesia. Jurnal PPKn & Hukum, 12(2), 1-15.

Chen, G. Q., & Li, Y. N. (2008). Defining government responsibility – From the perspective of responsibility relation. Comparative Economic and Social Systems. (3), 69.

Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The new public service: serving, not steering, 3rd ed. London: Routledge.

Direktorat Politik dan Komunikasi (2018). Data Ormas dan LSM di Indonesia uploads › 2018/12 diakses 27 September 2021.

Dwiyanto, A. (2021). Mewujudkan good governance melalui pelayanan publik. Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Gao, F. F. (2009). Response analysis of government in service-oriented government construction. Journal of North China Electric Power University, (6), 81-84, 98.

He, Z. K. (2000). The focus on government response. Chinese Public Administration, (7), 7-8.
Li, F., & Han, Z. M. (2014). The intensity and its analysis of the government’s response-in the perspective of the internet public incidents. Journal of Northeast Normal University, (1), 1-8.

Liu, L. R. (2009). Growth of public network views, political connotations and government response in China. Journal of Guangdong Institute of Public Administration, (5), 22-26.

Liu, Z. X, (2012). Interest and risk: Public policy analysis towards the risky society. Chinese Public Administration, (8), 115-119.

Lou, C. W., & Gu, A. H. (2006). The philosophical interpretation of administrative response. Chinese Public Administration, (9), 97-100.

Lu, K. J (2008). Constructing a respondent government with a view of duty, efficiency and service. Academic Research, (5), 55-60.

Mahendra, G. K., & Pribadi, U. (2014). Efektivitas pelaksanaan pelayanan pengaduan masyarakat berbasis e-government. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 1(1), 53- 75. doi:

Nurtjahjo, H. (2005). Lembaga, badan, dan komisi negara independen (state auxiliary agencies) di Indonesia: Tinjauan hukum tata negara. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, (3), 275-267.

Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1993). Reinventing government (How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector). NY: Plume Book.

Purwanto, E. A. (2008). Keluhan sebagai bentuk partisipasi. Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik. 12(1), 21-40. doi:

Qi, G. (2006). Social transformation, social governance, and social response mechanism chain. Journal of Southwest China Normal University, (11), 109-114.

Qi, G. H. (2008). Competence model of civil servants based on government response. Chinese Public Administration, (5), 115-118.

Ramadani, R. (2020). Lembaga negara independen di Indonesia dalam perspektif konsep Independent Regulatory Agencies. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 27(1), 169-192.

Rosenau, J. N. (1995). Governance in the Twenty-first Century. Global Governance, 1(1), 13- 43.
Santoso, P. (2008). Administrasi publik: Teori dan aplikasi good government. Indonesia, Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Sun, F. F. (2010). Government response: The key to play policy influence of civil society in China. Guangxi Social Sciences, (5), 120-123.

Wang, W. (2005). The transformation of government response on connotation and model. Probe, (1), 56-60, 64.

Weng, S. H, & Gu, L. M. (2012). The response modes of government decision-making to internet political participation. Chinese Public Administration, (8), 37-41.

Widodo, D. (2001). Akuntabilitas dan kontrol birokrasi. Indonesia, Surabaya: Insan Cendikia.

Wu, T. S. (2014). The action choice of local government response to public based on policy participation. Guangxi Social Sciences, (1), 127-133.

You, H. J. (2006). The transformation and practice of government response on dominant pattern. Chongqing Social Sciences, (12), 104-108.

Zhihua, B. (2015). Process and value: Summary on government response in China. Public Administration Research, 4(1), 51-58. doi:10.5539/par.v4n1p51
Abstract viewed = 141 times