GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN CHINA AND PRACTICE IN INDONESIA
Abstract
Studies in China and Indonesia have not explained how the actual practice of government response is based on factual observations. Based on the conceptual findings of research in China, this study elaborates on the practice of government response as a process in Indonesia. Research takes the object of research as the object of observation. Researchers review research achievements in China and intuitively observe practices in Indonesia. The results of the review and observation of government response research as a process show that almost all concepts, models and types of government responses in China are practiced by the Indonesian government. Studies in China and practice in Indonesia, following the perspective of governance, government-citizen interaction, response attitude, and the manner and content of government responses. Based on a study in China, which is very rich in concepts, the Indonesian government's response appears to be more chronological, careful, flexible, and considerate. Scholars in both countries can learn from and draw on experiences for further studies that are useful in the construction of respondent government models, as well as provide useful empirical examples for improving government response capacity.
References
Chen, G. Q., & Li, Y. N. (2008). Defining government responsibility – From the perspective of responsibility relation. Comparative Economic and Social Systems. (3), 69.
Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The new public service: serving, not steering, 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
Direktorat Politik dan Komunikasi (2018). Data Ormas dan LSM di Indonesia http://ditpolkom.bappenas.go.id uploads › 2018/12 diakses 27 September 2021.
Dwiyanto, A. (2021). Mewujudkan good governance melalui pelayanan publik. Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Gao, F. F. (2009). Response analysis of government in service-oriented government construction. Journal of North China Electric Power University, (6), 81-84, 98.
He, Z. K. (2000). The focus on government response. Chinese Public Administration, (7), 7-8.
Li, F., & Han, Z. M. (2014). The intensity and its analysis of the government’s response-in the perspective of the internet public incidents. Journal of Northeast Normal University, (1), 1-8.
Liu, L. R. (2009). Growth of public network views, political connotations and government response in China. Journal of Guangdong Institute of Public Administration, (5), 22-26.
Liu, Z. X, (2012). Interest and risk: Public policy analysis towards the risky society. Chinese Public Administration, (8), 115-119.
Lou, C. W., & Gu, A. H. (2006). The philosophical interpretation of administrative response. Chinese Public Administration, (9), 97-100.
Lu, K. J (2008). Constructing a respondent government with a view of duty, efficiency and service. Academic Research, (5), 55-60.
Mahendra, G. K., & Pribadi, U. (2014). Efektivitas pelaksanaan pelayanan pengaduan masyarakat berbasis e-government. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 1(1), 53- 75. doi: https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v1i1.2093
Nurtjahjo, H. (2005). Lembaga, badan, dan komisi negara independen (state auxiliary agencies) di Indonesia: Tinjauan hukum tata negara. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, (3), 275-267.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1993). Reinventing government (How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector). NY: Plume Book.
Purwanto, E. A. (2008). Keluhan sebagai bentuk partisipasi. Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik. 12(1), 21-40. doi: https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.8391
Qi, G. (2006). Social transformation, social governance, and social response mechanism chain. Journal of Southwest China Normal University, (11), 109-114.
Qi, G. H. (2008). Competence model of civil servants based on government response. Chinese Public Administration, (5), 115-118.
Ramadani, R. (2020). Lembaga negara independen di Indonesia dalam perspektif konsep Independent Regulatory Agencies. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 27(1), 169-192.
Rosenau, J. N. (1995). Governance in the Twenty-first Century. Global Governance, 1(1), 13- 43.
Santoso, P. (2008). Administrasi publik: Teori dan aplikasi good government. Indonesia, Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Sun, F. F. (2010). Government response: The key to play policy influence of civil society in China. Guangxi Social Sciences, (5), 120-123.
Wang, W. (2005). The transformation of government response on connotation and model. Probe, (1), 56-60, 64.
Weng, S. H, & Gu, L. M. (2012). The response modes of government decision-making to internet political participation. Chinese Public Administration, (8), 37-41.
Widodo, D. (2001). Akuntabilitas dan kontrol birokrasi. Indonesia, Surabaya: Insan Cendikia.
Wu, T. S. (2014). The action choice of local government response to public based on policy participation. Guangxi Social Sciences, (1), 127-133.
You, H. J. (2006). The transformation and practice of government response on dominant pattern. Chongqing Social Sciences, (12), 104-108.
Zhihua, B. (2015). Process and value: Summary on government response in China. Public Administration Research, 4(1), 51-58. doi:10.5539/par.v4n1p51
Copyright (c) 2021 Tjatur Ermitajani Judi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors whose manuscript is published will approve the following provisions:
-
The right to publication of all journal material published on the WIDYA PUBLIKA journal website is held by the editorial board with the author's knowledge (moral rights remain the property of the author).
-
The formal legal provisions for access to digital articles of this electronic journal are subject to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA) license, which means Jurnal of WIDYA PUBLIKA reserves the right to store, modify the format, administer in the database, maintain and publish articles without requesting permission from the Author as long as it keeps the Author's name as the owner of Copyright.
-
Printed and electronically published manuscripts are open access for educational, research, and library purposes. In addition to these objectives, the editorial board shall not be liable for violations of copyright law.
