INVENTION: Journal of Intellectual Property Law

Penegakan Hak Inventor atas Sengketa Pengalihan Paten: Analisis Normatif Berdasarkan UU Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 tentang Paten (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 283 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2025)

2026-08-17T03:29:20+00:00

Pengalihan hak ekonomi atas suatu invensi dari inventor kepada pihak lain lazim dilakukan melalui mekanisme pengalihan hak paten. Dalam praktiknya, mekanisme tersebut berpotensi menimbulkan sengketa apabila dasar hukum pengalihan diperselisihkan. Persoalan ini tergambar dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 283 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2025 mengenai sengketa pengalihan hak paten atas invensi Perbaikan Konstruksi Sarang Laba-Laba. Perkara diajukan oleh para ahli waris inventor dengan dalil bahwa pengalihan hak paten tidak didasarkan pada perjanjian pengalihan hak sebagaimana dipersyaratkan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 tentang Paten, melainkan hanya surat kuasa pendaftaran paten. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji perlindungan hukum bagi inventor serta akibat hukum pengalihan hak paten berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 tentang Paten. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus, serta dianalisis secara deskriptif-analitis berdasarkan bahan hukum sekunder melalui studi dokumen dan kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 283 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2025 memberikan perlindungan hukum preventif kepada inventor melalui pengakuan sahnya pengalihan hak paten berdasarkan dokumen pengalihan hak, pencatatan pada Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual, serta kewajiban pembayaran royalti kepada inventor. Putusan tersebut mengukuhkan PT Katama Surya Bumi sebagai pemegang paten yang sah beserta hak eksklusifnya, sekaligus mengakui inventor sebagai pemilik hak moral atas invensi. Akibat hukum pengalihan meliputi tetap sahnya kedudukan pemegang paten, beralihnya hak ekonomi atas invensi, timbulnya hubungan hukum antara inventor dan pemegang paten, serta berakhirnya hak eksklusif setelah masa perlindungan paten berakhir pada 28 Januari 2024. Berakhirnya perlindungan tersebut membuka invensi untuk dimanfaatkan publik tanpa menghapus pengakuan terhadap hak moral inventor.

Problematika Penerapan Pendaftaran Izin Berusaha Berbasis Rencana Detail Tata Ruang Dalam Sistem Pertanahan Nasional

2026-06-22T02:33:02+00:00

The implementation of risk-based business licensing through the Online Single Submission (OSS) system places the Detailed Spatial Plan (RDTR) as a key basis for issuing business permits. This policy aims to accelerate licensing procedures and enhance legal certainty. However, in practice, RDTR-based business licensing raises juridical issues within the national land law system. This study examines the juridical problems of RDTR-based business licensing and their implications for legal certainty. Using normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches, the study finds inconsistencies between the spatial planning and land law regimes, weak examination of land rights legality, and potential violations of good governance principles. Additionally, the uneven availability of RDTR across regions leads to unequal legal treatment. Therefore, strengthening the integration of spatial planning and land administration is essential to ensure legal certainty in business licensing.

Kekosongan Norma Pengaturan Valuasi Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Aset Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia.

2026-06-22T02:56:27+00:00

This study aims to examine the normative gap in the regulation of Intellectual Property (IP) valuation as an asset within the Indonesian legal system. As an intangible asset, Intellectual Property possesses significant economic value and has increasingly been recognized as an asset that can be utilized in business activities and financing schemes, including as collateral. However, Indonesia currently lacks comprehensive legal provisions governing the standards, methods, and mechanisms for the valuation of Intellectual Property. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings reveal that the existing legal framework does not provide adequate legal certainty regarding the valuation process of Intellectual Property, particularly concerning valuation standards and the institutions authorized to conduct such valuations. This condition creates various obstacles to the utilization of Intellectual Property as an economic asset, especially in legal relationships involving creditors and debtors. Therefore, this study recommends the establishment of a clearer, more integrated, and comprehensive regulatory framework on Intellectual Property valuation to ensure legal certainty and support the optimal utilization of Intellectual Property as a valuable economic asset.

Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Selebritas Instagram Yang Terlibat Dalam Promosi Judi Online.

2026-06-22T02:26:37+00:00

The development of information and communication technology has brought significant changes to patterns of social interaction within society, particularly through the use of social media. The promotion of online gambling by Instagram celebrities (selebgram) through social media raises issues of criminal liability under Indonesian law. Selebgrams play a role in disseminating prohibited gambling content, thereby potentially expanding online gambling practices. This study aims to analyze the criminal liability of selebgrams who promote online gambling under Indonesian criminal law. This research employs a normative legal method with a statutory approach. The findings indicate that selebgrams who intentionally promote online gambling may be held criminally liable under the Electronic Information and Transactions Law and relevant provisions of the Indonesian Criminal Code.