PENGATURAN PEMBERIAN HAK REMISI BAGI NARAPIDANA DI INDONESIA, STUDI KOMPARASI DENGAN BEBERAPA NEGARA LAIN DI DUNIA
Abstract
The regulation of remission rights for prisoners in Indonesia refers to The Republic of Indonesia Law No. 12 of 1995 about Corrections and their derivative regulations, namely The Government of the Republic of Indonesia Regulation No. 99 of 2012 about The Second Amendment to The Republic of Indonesia Government Regulation No. 32 of 1999 about the Terms and Procedures for the Implementation of the Rights of Correctional Inmates and The Decree of the President of the Republic of Indonesia No. 174 of 1999 about Remissions. In these provisions, it regulates general conditions for prisoners to obtain remission rights and special conditions in certain criminal acts for prisoners to obtain remission. This then raises the pros and cons of tightening the granting of remission rights for convicts of certain crimes in Indonesia. If this is compared with several other countries in the world, it can be concluded that there are countries that also regulate tightening in the granting of remission rights for prisoners, while those that provide remissions equally regardless of the type of crime committed by the inmates, depending on the policies of each country. Therefore, Indonesia should in drafting provisions regarding tightening the granting of remission rights for inmates must carefully consider the reasons for the pros and cons that occurred, so that the rules created do not cause continuous polemics. This writing aims to provide new contributions to science to be published using normative research methods.
References
Atmasasmita. R. (2002). Korupsi, Good Governance & Komisi Anti Korupsi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, Departemen Kehakiman dan HAM RI.
Atmasasmita. R. & Soemadipradja. (1979). Sistem Pemasyarakatan Di Indonesia. Bandung: Bina Cipta.
Deflem. N. (2007). Sociological Theories of Law in Encyclopedia of Law and Society: American and Global Perspectives. California: Thousand Oaks.
Gunakarya. A.W. (1998). Sejarah dan Konsep Pemasyarakatan. Bandung: Armico.
Harsono. C.I. (1995). Sistem Baru Pembinaan Narapidana. Jakarta: Djambatan.
Marlina. (2011). Hukum Penitensier. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Poernomo. B. (1986). Pelaksanaan Pidana Penjara Dengan Sistem Pemasyarakatan. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Priyatno. D. (2006). Sistem Pelaksanaan Pidana Penjara di Indonesia. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Sudirman. D. (2006). Masalah-Masalah Aktual Bidang Pemasyarakatan, Jakarta: Pusat Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Kebijakan Departemen Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia.
Wahyu Wagiman. W. (2012). Kebijakan moratorium Remisi dan Dampaknya Terhadap Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia. Jakarta: Instititute for Criminal Justice Reform.
Jurnal
Hendratno. E.T. (2013). Kebijakan Pemberian Remisi bagi Koruptor, Suatu Telaah Kritis dari Perspektif Sosiologi Hukum. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan. Tahun ke-44 No. 4.
Novianti. (2021). Pro Kontra Putusan MK No. 41/PUU-XIX/2021 terkait Pemberian Remisi bagi Narapidana Tindak Pidana Korupsi.Jurnal Bidang Hukum Info Singkat. Vol. XIII No. 19/I/Puslit/Oktober.
Sari. A.A.A.W.W.K., & Purwani, S.P.M.E. (2019). Pengetatan Syarat Pemberian Remisi bagi Narapidana Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia Ditinjau dari Perspektif HAM. Kertha Wicara Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 8 No. 4.
Skripsi
Ismoyowati. S. (2017). Pelaksanaan kebijakan Moratorium Remisi Terhadap Terpidana Korupsi Menurut UU No. 12 Tahun 1995. Bandung: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Parahyangan.
Putri. A.T. (2021). Pemberian Remisi Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya.
Rakhmad. N. (2013). Kendala Proses Pengajuan Remisi Dalam PP Nomor 99 Tahun 2012. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya.
Undang-Undang
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 022/PUU-III/2005 perihal Pengujian Undang-Undang RI Nomor 12 Tahun 1995 tentang Pemasyarakatan terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, 1 Maret 2006
Lain- Lain
Corrective Services Act 2000, Act no. 63 of 2000.
Correction Regulation 1998 (S.R. 1998, No. 104) – Reg 24.
Prisons and Refornartories Act R.S., c. P-21, s. 1.
Singapore’s Criminal Procedure Code (Chapter 8) (Original Enacment: Act 15 of 2010) Revised Edition 2012 (31st August 2012).
Copyright (c) 2022 R. Aditayoga Nugraha Bimasakti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors whose manuscript is published will approve the following provisions:
-
The right to publication of all journal material published on the AKTUAL JUSTICE journal website is held by the editorial board with the author's knowledge (moral rights remain the property of the author).
-
The formal legal provisions for access to digital articles of this electronic journal are subject to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA) license, which means Jurnal of AKTUAL JUSTICE reserves the right to store, modify the format, administer in the database, maintain and publish articles without requesting permission from the Author as long as it keeps the Author's name as the owner of Copyright.
-
Printed and electronically published manuscripts are open access for educational, research, and library purposes. In addition to these objectives, the editorial board shall not be liable for violations of copyright law.
