PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEMENANG LELANG SEBAGAI PEMBELI BERITIKAD BAIK YANG DIGUGAT KEMBALI
Abstract
When the bank debtors did not make the payment, the bank as the holder of the mortgage is bound in the credit agreement by obtaining fulfillment of the debtor's credit through an auction process as mandated by law. Problems will arise if the auction winner cannot own or control what he has won because the debtor uses the auction process on the collateral. Then the winner of the auction is a buyer with ‘good faith’ who must be protected by law, and legal protection for the buyer with ‘good faith’ as stated in article 584 of the Civil Code of ‘good faith’ exists if the property rights are obtained through one of the means to obtain property rights, where from that article It is known that some of the transfer of existing property rights cannot be separated from the existence of the agreement law in the Civil Code. Legal remedies that can be taken by the injured parties during the auction execution by the court if there is a rebuttal due to the lawsuit made by the original owner which is later won by the court's decision of the original owner, then the auction holder can submit legal remedies to the high court to resolve the problem by way of an appeal to the Supreme Court. This is because selling through an auction is a civil selling effort and legal remedies that can be taken within the scope of civil law.
References
Angin,E.P. (1994). Peraturan Lelang. Jakarta: Esa Study Club
Harahap, M.Y., (1986). Segi-Segi Perjanjian. Bandung: PT. Alumni
Hernoko, A.Y. (2008). Hukum Perjanjian Asas Proporsionalitas Dalam Kontrak Komersial. Yogyakarta: Mediatama
Khairandy, R. (2004). Itikad Baik Dalam Kebebasan Berkontrak. Jakarta: UI Press
Muhammad, A.K.(2000). Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Bandung: Cintra Aditya
Prodjodikoro,W. (1993). Asas-asas Hukum Perjanjian. Bandung : Sumur
Subekti, R. (2014). Aneka Perjanjian.Bandung. Bandung: PT. Aditya Bakti
2. Jurnal
Gunarsoh, A. (2012). Analisis Sistem Informasi dan Sistem Pengendalian Internal Perkreditan pada PT. BTPN MUR (Mitra Usaha Rakyat) Tbk Cabang Panakukang. Jurnal Akuntansi, Universitas Gunadarma. Volume 2. Nomor 2
Yusmita, Riski Pebru Ariyanti, Enricho Duo Putra Njoto, Rizal Yudistira. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Terhdap Debitur Dan Kreditur Dalam Melakukan Perjanjian Baku. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. Volume 15 Nomor 1. Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya.
3. Artikel Internet
Muhammad faisal,(2016).Upoya Perlindungan Hukum Pemenang Lelang Sebagai Pembeli Beritikad Baik Terhdap Putusan Re-Eksekusi. Available from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301740741_UPAYA_PERLINDUNGAN_HUKUM_PEMENANG_LELANG_SEBAGAI_PEMBELI_BERITIKAD_BAIK_TERHADAP_PUTUSAN_RE-EKSEKUSI. Diakses pada 5 Februari 2020.
Authors whose manuscript is published will approve the following provisions:
-
The right to publication of all journal material published on the AKTUAL JUSTICE journal website is held by the editorial board with the author's knowledge (moral rights remain the property of the author).
-
The formal legal provisions for access to digital articles of this electronic journal are subject to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA) license, which means Jurnal of AKTUAL JUSTICE reserves the right to store, modify the format, administer in the database, maintain and publish articles without requesting permission from the Author as long as it keeps the Author's name as the owner of Copyright.
-
Printed and electronically published manuscripts are open access for educational, research, and library purposes. In addition to these objectives, the editorial board shall not be liable for violations of copyright law.